Constitutional Decree Statutory Law & Union

Constitutional Decree Statutory Law & Union

By: D.B.A. Jesus Christ - G.O.T.A., & C.J.S. United State of Chaka Zulu 

Constitutional Decree - 60 ABC - Statutory Law and the Rights to Sexual Orientation - Constitutional Meets Constitutionality Test Criteria 

Can a Person be found guilty in the court of law for statutory rape based on the law of marriage?  No.

Wherefore, marriage was unconstitutional since the declaration of independence, which was a separation agreement. Wherefore, if a human is married under the law of marriage, it would be a criminal act, under the pretense of this law to get married to another person while still married to anther person under a separation agreement, wherefore under a separation agreement there is still the presumption of marriage, until a final decree is determined.  Wherefore, to get married while legally separated could be considered bigamy. 

Field Order #15

Wherefore, if a person sought after a legal separation due to an abusive situation, the court may decide the best arrangement for the abused pending the final legal decree, to be a order of protection, to prevent further abuse while a final decree is sought.  Wherefore, the abuse spouse realizes he/she is still presumed to be married, wherefore, in such an arrangement there is no martial rights.  And there are grounds for an annulment rather than a divorce, if reconciliation is not possible or desired,  A. incompatibility. B. No Consummation,  Wherefore, marriage cannot be established, the persons involved are not loved and this is mutual.  Wherefore, if on person loves the other, yet is left unloved, there, this too is grounds for an annulment.

Wherefore, if a divorce is the final decree, there may be issues of settlement and support, but under an annulment, there is not settlement, wherefore it is as if the marriage never existed.  Wherefore, any property gained based on this marriage, is determined by the Law, to be gained based on a fraudulent arrangement and there is no statute of limitations to fraud.  Wherefore the annulment of article 6 of the U.S.C.U.G., under the War Power Act, by G.O.T.A., who has Executive Authority granted by the U.S.C.U.G. and Congressional approval, is a legal decree of annulment between the law the Union and the lawless the Confederate, Better known as the NAZI.  Wherefore, to do lawless acts with the intent of being lawless, is an act of being anti-law.  Wherefore, God is the Law and certainly under the War Powers Act and with executive Authority, not only is God the law, but his authority by the U.S. Constitution has been duly recognized. Anti-Law is Anti-Christ.

Read - Holy Bible New International Version 2014 - John:8:12-19, 1 CO:11:3 and Palms:118:22,

Wherefore, there is no law of marriage, there can be no statutory laws concerning sexual practice based on the law of marriage. However, Amendments 35 thru 41 and the 1st and 2nd amendments and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, dealing with the right to sexual orientation and not asexual orientation, makes clear and constitutional, wherefore, the laws of statutory rape is determined by the law of Union and the law of Union is religion decree and the only religion sanctioned by God is Order of ZEWS.  And let us not confuse religion’s doctrine with the Church in congregation.  Wherefore, there can be no statutory crime based on a non existent statutory law.

Citations

:

The Union State Constitution Under God

1. The 1st Amendment

2. the 2nd Amendment

3. The Civil Rights Act of 1964

4. USCUG Amendments 35 thru 41

5. The Declaration of Emancipation - Article 441-Y - The War Powers Act & the Constitutional Decrees

6. Statutory Law on Fraud

7. The 4th Amendment

8. 18 USC

9. Statutory Law and the lack of statutory Law and Criminal Law

10. Field Order #15 - Signed by Major Gen. Sherman - As His Duty Assignment

11. The Declaration of Independence

12. Chaka Mosi Kamanu Zulu v. Egan (2003)

No Locale Law can Supersede Union Law.

Executive Authority - The War Powers Act

The 5 Stars - The Authority to Execute - G.O.T.A.

Centered is the Perfect Square - The Symbol of Perfection - C.J.S.

                                                     D.B.A. Jesus Christ - G.O.T.A. & C.J.S.

CrimeThe Hate Crimes against Jesus Christ Act & Reques

                              John:8:12:19, 1CO:13.3, Palms:118:22 - I and the Father Are One

To: The U.S. Supreme Court – O.I.G.

The Blue House Locale 462 –Order of ZEWS

Jones, DCZ, 20050

From: The Reverend Frank Paul Jones – The Messiah

923 S.A. Ave – Order of ZEWS – Locale 31

Avon Park, FL. 33825

2 October 2018

RE: The Hate Crimes against Jesus Christ Act & Request for Emergency Hate Crimes Provisions for members of a Protected Group.

I attest in sound mind and memory, with due diligence and without duress, I and my family have documented proof we are hate crimes victims.  Each and every member of Jesus Christ, INC, under the file of Department of Justice File # 3704895, have been hated due to preconceived notions and that is based on prejudice and not anything we have done to those who have made our lives event of daily humiliation.

I was brutally beaten here in Augusta, GA by Federal Police, after my medical records was transferred to Augusta VAMC, due to hate crime in Highlands County by Dr. Doris Borden a fraudulent doctor.  She has no license to practice medicine.  It was on film and I still have the bone fragment in my chest due to the healing process taken place in Detention due to invalid accusers in each case.  I spend most of the last year in detention and did not get convicted on any crime or was even accused of committing a crime.  Now I and my family are in exile from the State of Florida with nowhere safe for us to be together as a Union.  I need immediate help in housing, food, clothing, protection and mediation to remedy these hate crimes against me and my family.  And under VHA I request what was already granted me, Choice health care due to the circumstance of continued hatred towards us at the VAMC and the fact that there is no VAMC within 45 miles radius of my home.  And under VHA with buy in, I have both Medicare and Medicaid buy in at $650 and I AM a War Veteran served in USAEUAR and the war ended the day I stepped food in Germany 1 Jan 1977.

Since 2009, I have been Baker Act over 40 to 50 times without reason and have been diagnosed as a Martha Mitchell Effect Victim.

The Martha Mitchell effect is the process by which a psychiatrist, psychologist, or other mental health clinician labels the patient's accurate perception of real events as delusional and misdiagnoses accordingly.

According to Bell et al., "Sometimes, improbable reports are erroneously assumed to be symptoms of mental illness", due to a "failure or inability to verify whether the events have actually taken place, no matter how improbable intuitively they might appear to the busy clinician".^[1] They note that typical examples of such situations may include:

• Pursuit by organized criminals
• Surveillance by law enforcement officers
• Infidelity by a spouse
• Physical issues

Quoting psychotherapist Joseph Berke, the authors note that "even paranoids have enemies". Any patient, they explain, can be misdiagnosed by clinicians, especially patients with a history of paranoid delusions.

Of note is how habitually patients are diagnosed as delusional when their grievances concern health care workers and/or health care institutions, even when the patient has no history of delusion. "A patient arriving claiming to have been injured by another health care professional is regarded as a crazy person who potentially could ruin the career of an innocent colleague."^[2]

Cases

State of Florida v. Frank Paul Jones (2016) Invalid Accusery  

State of Georgia v. Frank Paul Jones (2017) Invalid Accusery

City of New York v. Frank Paul Jones (2017) Invalid Accusery

Chaka Mosi Kamanu Zulu v. Egan (2003) - Cardinal Egan the Dir. of DOC

State of Florida v. Izzy Rodriquez Jones (2016) whose name is Izzy Jones and DNA proved angels Exist on earth today.  This case expanded into a Interstate FBI probe of child abductions.  HEPAA Violations with Intent.

Citations:  Punishment for Hate Crimes are more severe. And statute of limitations for hate crimes only begin with the last hate crime ceases.  Then there is the 7 years statute of limitations and there is no statue of limitation for fraud or murder.

A hate crime (also known as a bias-motivated crime or bias crime) is a prejudice-motivated crime which occurs when a perpetrator targets a victim because of his or her membership (or perceived membership) in a certain social group or race.

The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, enacted in 28 U.S.C. § 994 note Sec. 280003, requires the United States Sentencing Commission to increase the penalties for hate crimes committed on the basis of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, or gender of any person.

18 U.S. Code § 249 - Hate crime acts

(a) In General.—

(1)Offenses involving actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin.—Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, a dangerous weapon, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin of any person—

(A)

shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and

(B) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this title, or both, if—

(i)

death results from the offense; or

(ii)

the offense includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.

(2) Offenses involving actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability.—

(A)In general.—Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, in any circumstance described in subparagraph (B) or paragraph (3), willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, a dangerous weapon, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person—

(i)

shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and

(ii) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this title, or both, if—

(I)

death results from the offense; or

(II)

the offense includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.

(B)Circumstances described.—For purposes of subparagraph (A), the circumstances described in this subparagraph are that—

(i) the conduct described in subparagraph (A) occurs during the course of, or as the result of, the travel of the defendant or the victim—

(I)

across a State line or national border; or

(II)

using a channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce;

(ii)

the defendant uses a channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce in connection with the conduct described in subparagraph (A);

(iii)

in connection with the conduct described in subparagraph (A), the defendant employs a firearm, dangerous weapon, explosive or incendiary device, or other weapon that has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce; or

(iv) the conduct described in subparagraph (A)—

(I)

interferes with commercial or other economic activity in which the victim is engaged at the time of the conduct; or

(II)

otherwise affects interstate or foreign commerce.

(3)Offenses occurring in the special maritime or territorial jurisdiction of the united states.—

Whoever, within the special maritime or territorial jurisdiction of the United States, engages in conduct described in paragraph (1) or in paragraph (2)(A) (without regard to whether that conduct occurred in a circumstance described in paragraph (2)(B)) shall be subject to the same penalties as prescribed in those paragraphs.

(4)Guidelines.—

All prosecutions conducted by the United States under this section shall be undertaken pursuant to guidelines issued by the Attorney General, or the designee of the Attorney General, to be included in the United States Attorneys’ Manual that shall establish neutral and objective criteria for determining whether a crime was committed because of the actual or perceived status of any person.

(b) Certification Requirement.—

(1)In general.—No prosecution of any offense described in this subsection may be undertaken by the United States, except under the certification in writing of the Attorney General, or a designee, that—

(A)

the State does not have jurisdiction;

(B)

the State has requested that the Federal Government assume jurisdiction;

(C)

the verdict or sentence obtained pursuant to State charges left demonstratively unvindicated the Federal interest in eradicating bias-motivated violence; or

(D)

a prosecution by the United States is in the public interest and necessary to secure substantial justice.

(2)Rule of construction.—

Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to limit the authority of Federal officers, or a Federal grand jury, to investigate possible violations of this section.

(c)Definitions.—In this section—

(1)

the term “bodily injury” has the meaning given such term in section 1365(h)(4) of this title, but does not include solely emotional or psychological harm to the victim;

(2)

the term “explosive or incendiary device” has the meaning given such term in section 232 of this title;

(3)

the term “firearm” has the meaning given such term in section 921(a) of this title;

(4)

the term “gender identity” means actual or perceived gender-related characteristics; and

(5)

the term “State” includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and any other territory or possession of the United States.

(d) Statute of Limitations.—

(1)Offenses not resulting in death.—

Except as provided in paragraph (2), no person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for any offense under this section unless the indictment for such offense is found, or the information for such offense is instituted, not later than 7 years after the date on which the offense was committed.

(2)Death resulting offenses.—

An indictment or information alleging that an offense under this section resulted in death may be found or instituted at any time without limitation.

(Added and amended Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, §§ 4707(a), 4711, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2838, 2842.)

Amendments

2009—Subsec. (a)(4). Pub. L. 111–84, § 4711, added par. (4).

Severability

Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, § 4709, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2841, which related to severability of provisions, was editorially reclassified as section 30505 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

Rule of Construction

Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, § 4710, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2841, which related to construction, was editorially reclassified as section 30506 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

Findings

Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, § 4702, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2835, which set out Congressional findings related to hate crimes, was editorially reclassified as section 30501 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

______________________________________

Rev. Frank Paul Jones – The Messiah

Signed: 2 October 2018

DBA Jesus Christ  - G.O.T.A. and C.J.S.