Showing posts with label Constitutional Decree - 60 ABC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Constitutional Decree - 60 ABC. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

Child support, Civil Law V. Civil Law

Civil Law V. Civil Law

Constitutional Decree:

 The question is about the enforcement of a civil agreement made with the intent by mutual agreement.  Wherefore, civil law is not a decision on a criminal action. Wherefore, a decision of civil intent cannot be deemed criminal unless criminal intent can be proven and for a criminal prosecution it must be beyond reasonable doubt in criminal law and the alleged crime must be listed under the penal code.

The question of child support comes to question.  How can a person be arressred time again and spend in some cases 10 years in a life time in detention due to non payment of civil consequence and end up in detention, unemployable, reduced in the labor pool market, who right to work is not even honored due to a financial setback and not criminal intent.

It is double jeapordy. This is merely a poor man tax and is unconstitutional to place someone especially a someone in detention time and time again, like it is a revolving door, over and over again, simple because said person cannot afford a civil payment, which had to be a mutual agreement to begin with, due to the intent at a given time, is double jeapordy. It is a poor man's tax and the taxation of the people is unconstitutional.

Wherefore, in the absence of criminal intent, no civil offense can be considered a criminal action under the penal code.

Furthermore, the purpose of the U.S.C.U.G. intent is to protect society is the people, the production process and property and in doing so obey the law and the law is Jesus Christ, who is love and love is charity.

Child support, a car payment, a home payment or any payment valued in currency cannot be deemed a criminal infraction unless criminal intent can be proven. Or else, everyone in the world would be deemed a crook, wherefore, there is a lack of currency and high levels of criminal activities, preventing consistency in financial obligations.

Child support is not in itself a criminal act as far as non payment to a commitment.  Also, I ask, how can a person justify, incarceration f a human being, for lack of financial support of someone who is also getting support from the same person.

In fact, this could be considered racketeering, to punish a person to gain HUD funding, which had it been allocated as intended, would not have resulted in persons being in need. Again, I ask you look into your heart and use common sense, child support non payment without criminal intent at most is a issue or concern of financial management or mismanagement and is grounds to educate and guide and certainly there can not be is is not a penal code called not making a civil oblegation by mutual consent.

In conclusion under the U.S.C.U.G. the right to practice religion also includes Zulu Tradition and we stand by, "it takes a village to raise a child, Union members have the right to be judge by a jury of own peers and the same institution paying for the incarceration of the so called deadbeat dad, is paying for these detentions which result in the reverse of the intent of the law.  This is unconstitutional.

Wherefore, being the Union is the payer, how did the state become the payee from a person indigent in many cases for non-payment or Extortion fees, almost always without merit.

In conclusion, not only is children support lack of payment certainly by a person due to lack of funds or even mismanagement and often by a person of layman status, is a matter of financial management and not criminal intent.  Wherefore, to arrest a person for non-payment of children support without proof of criminal intent, is to arrest a person on an invalid Accusery, to arrest a person for an act not covered in the penal code.

Wherefore, a judge cannot hear a case, not listed in the penal code, because to convict a person for a crime, every element required for a conviction must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt under the law.

In the absence of a penal code,there are no elements and wherefore, the judge cannot hear this case in criminal court.

Lastly, due to the War Powers Act and Executive Authority GOTA, G.O.T.A. is the sole authority of or to grant any human being executive clemency.  This is the promise of those who fight for thier freedom, the right to life, liberty and Justice, if you obey the law and this is an extension of the right of all citizens in this Union.

G.O.T.A.







Thursday, October 4, 2018

Constitutional Decree - 60 ABC - Statutory Law and the Rights to Sexual Orientation


By: D.B.A. Jesus Christ - G.O.T.A., & C.J.S. United State of Chaka Zulu
Constitutional Decree - 60 ABC - Statutory Law and the Rights to Sexual Orientation - Constitutional Meets Constitutionality Test Criteria
Can a Person be found guilty in the court of law for statutory rape based on the law of marriage?  No.
Wherefore, marriage was unconstitutional since the declaration of independence, which was a separation agreement. Wherefore, if a human is married under the law of marriage, it would be a criminal act, under the pretense of this law to get married to another person while still married to anther person under a separation agreement, wherefore under a separation agreement there is still the presumption of marriage, until a final decree is determined.  Wherefore, to get married while legally separated could be considered bigamy.
Field Order #15
Wherefore, if a person sought after a legal separation due to an abusive situation, the court may decide the best arrangement for the abused pending the final legal decree, to be a order of protection, to prevent further abuse while a final decree is sought.  Wherefore, the abuse spouse realizes he/she is still presumed to be married, wherefore, in such an arrangement there is no martial rights.  And there are grounds for an annulment rather than a divorce, if reconciliation is not possible or desired,  A. incompatibility. B. No Consummation,  Wherefore, marriage cannot be established, the persons involved are not loved and this is mutual.  Wherefore, if on person loves the other, yet is left unloved, there, this too is grounds for an annulment.
Wherefore, if a divorce is the final decree, there may be issues of settlement and support, but under an annulment, there is not settlement, wherefore it is as if the marriage never existed.  Wherefore, any property gained based on this marriage, is determined by the Law, to be gained based on a fraudulent arrangement and there is no statute of limitations to fraud.  Wherefore the annulment of article 6 of the U.S.C.U.G., under the War Power Act, by G.O.T.A., who has Executive Authority granted by the U.S.C.U.G. and Congressional approval, is a legal decree of annulment between the law the Union and the lawless the Confederate, Better known as the NAZI.  Wherefore, to do lawless acts with the intent of being lawless, is an act of being anti-law.  Wherefore, God is the Law and certainly under the War Powers Act and with executive Authority, not only is God the law, but his authority by the U.S. Constitution has been duly recognized. Anti-Law is Anti-Christ.
Read - Holy Bible New International Version 2014 - John:8:12-19, 1 CO:11:3 and Palms:118:22,
Wherefore, there is no law of marriage, there can be no statutory laws concerning sexual practice based on the law of marriage. However, Amendments 35 thru 41 and the 1st and 2nd amendments and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, dealing with the right to sexual orientation and not asexual orientation, makes clear and constitutional, wherefore, the laws of statutory rape is determined by the law of Union and the law of Union is religion decree and the only religion sanctioned by God is Order of ZEWS.  And let us not confuse religion’s doctrine with the Church in congregation.  Wherefore, there can be no statutory crime based on a non existent statutory law.
Citations:
The Union State Constitution Under God
1. The 1st Amendment
2. the 2nd Amendment
3. The Civil Rights Act of 1964
4. USCUG Amendments 35 thru 41
5. The Declaration of Emancipation - Article 441-Y - The War Powers Act & the Constitutional Decrees
6. Statutory Law on Fraud
7. The 4th Amendment
8. 18 USC
9. Statutory Law and the lack of statutory Law and Criminal Law
10. Field Order #15 - Signed by Major Gen. Sherman - As His Duty Assignment
11. The Declaration of Independence
12. Chaka Mosi Kamanu Zulu v. Egan (2003)
No Locale Law can Supersede Union Law.
Executive Authority - The War Powers Act

The 5 Stars - The Authority to Execute - G.O.T.A.
Centered is the Perfect Square - The Symbol of Perfection - C.J.S.
D.B.A. Jesus Christ - G.O.T.A. & C.J.S.